|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
Name: |
|
|
|
POOR 1 |
AVERAGE 2 |
GOOD 3 |
VERY GOOD 4 |
EXCELLENT 5 |
|
INFORMATION |
NO FACTUAL INFORMATION ON
TOPIC. (0) |
LITTLE FACTUAL
INFORMATION ON TOPIC. (1-3 FACTS) |
SOME FACTUAL INFORMATION (4-6
FACTS) |
A LOT OF
FACTUAL INFORMATION RELEVANT TO TOPIC (7-10 FACTS) |
AN ABUNDANCE OF
RELEVANT FACTUAL INFORMATION THAT ENHANCES THE WHOLE PROJECT. |
|
STRUCTURE/ORGANIZATION |
N0
ORGANIZATION OF INFORMATION. DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND. |
ORGANIZATION IS
AVERAGE. SORT OF HARD TO UNDERSTAND. |
INTERVIEW
IS WELL ORGANIZED AND ABLE TO UNDERSTAND. TENDS TO FOLLOW A SINGLE THEME |
STRUCTURE
AND ORGANIZATION IS EXCELLENT, VERY EASY TO READ. FOLLOWS A SINGLE THEME. |
STRUCTURE AND
ORGANIZATION IS EXCELLENT. THEME SHOWS RELEVANCE TO TRENDS IN FIELD. |
|
CONTENT |
FEW (1-3) TO NO
RELEVANT QUESTIONS |
SOME(4-6) RELEVANT QUESTIONS |
MODERATE
(7-9) RELEVANT QUESTIONS. INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL SOMEWHAT SEPARATED FROM
QUESTIONS |
ABUNDANT
(10+) RELEVANT QUESTIONS.INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL SEPARATED FROM QUESTIONS. |
INTRODUCTORY
MATERIAL SEPARATED FROM QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS DEMONSTRATE SUPERIOR
INTERVIEWING ABILITY |
|
MECHANICS (WORD USAGE, GRAMMAR, PUNCTUATION, CAPITILIZATION, ETC.) |
VERY POOR WORD
USAGE. NUMEROUS GRAMATICAL ERRORS. |
AVERAGE
WORD USAGE. INCORRECT PUNCTUATION AND CAPITILIZATION. |
WORD
USAGE AND GRAMMAR IS GOOD. SOME PUNCTUATION AND CAPITILIZATION ERRORS. |
NO
MECHANICAL ERRORS |
WRITING
QUALITY AND WORD USAGE ENHANCES THE OVERALL PROJECT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|